Evaluation Criteria and Scoring Method

Evaluation Criteria and Scoring Method

1. Tender Executive Summary (10%)
• Evaluate clarity, comprehensiveness, and relevance.
• Score out of 10: Higher scores for clear, concise summaries that effectively outline the proposal's key points.
2. Related Experience (10%)
• Assess the relevance and extent of past experience in similar projects.
• Score out of 10: More points for extensive and directly relevant past work.
3. Work in Hand (5%)
• Consider the current workload and how it might impact the project's delivery.
• Score out of 5: Lower scores if current workload seems too high, potentially affecting this project.
4. Proposed Added Value (5%)
• Look for innovative solutions or additional benefits not explicitly required.
• Score out of 5: Reward creative and beneficial added features.
5. Sub-facility Management (10%)
• Evaluate plans for managing various components of the facility.
• Score out of 10: Detailed, efficient sub-facility management plans score higher.
6. Resources and Facilities (10%)
• Assess the quality and adequacy of proposed resources and facilities.
• Score out of 10: High-quality, well-suited resources and facilities should receive higher scores.

Scoring Each Proposal

For each proposal:

1. Assign scores for each criterion based on the guidelines above.
2. Multiply each score by the respective weight (e.g., a score of 7 in Executive Summary becomes 0.7 after applying the 10% weight).
3. Sum these weighted scores to get the cumulative score for each proposal.